Worker Reaches Into Unguarded Punch Press — Grosnor Industries Fined $50,000
April 27, 2026 · 7 min read
The Worker Reached Into the Machine — What Happens When There Is No Guard Between a Worker and a Shearing Hazard
Let's talk about what happened at Grosnor Industries Inc.'s facility at 375 Rexdale Blvd. in Etobicoke on July 21, 2023. Grosnor produces textile samples for clients in the roofing, flooring, tile and siding industries. On that day, a worker employed by a temporary help agency was performing a die change on a punch press machine — a routine task. At some point during the die change, the worker reached through an unguarded gap to clean debris near the punch press blades. The exposed moving part created a shearing hazard — a danger zone that could crush, cut, or amputate anything that entered it while the machine was in operation. A second worker nearby did not see the first worker's hand in the machine. They activated the punch press. The first worker sustained a critical injury. A Ministry investigation confirmed that the exposed moving part generating the shearing hazard was not equipped with a guard or device to prevent worker access. There was no barrier. Nothing to stop a hand from entering the danger zone. Grosnor Industries Inc. pleaded guilty in the Ontario Provincial Offences Court in Toronto and was fined $50,000 plus a 25% victim fine surcharge.
Key Facts
What the Law Requires
Section 24 of Ontario Regulation 851 (Industrial Establishments) requires that where a machine part, function or process may endanger a worker, it shall be guarded or enclosed by a guard or other device that prevents access to the moving part from any direction. Basically, what this means is simple: if a part of a machine is moving and can hurt someone, it must be guarded. All the time it is in operation. The fact that the worker reached in to clean debris — not during an authorized lockout — points to a second failure: no procedure existed that prevented access to the danger zone during die changes. A guard would have made that access impossible. Without one, access was uncontrolled and the injury was predictable. In the court's view, this was not a freak accident — it was a foreseeable outcome of operating a machine with an unguarded shearing hazard. The conviction and $50,000 fine reflect how seriously the court takes this failure.
What Supervisors Must Do
- Before any die change, cleaning, or adjustment task begins near a punch press, confirm the machine is either properly guarded at the point of operation or fully locked out — there is no middle ground
- Walk the floor and identify every punch press where workers routinely reach near the operating zone; these machines must have point-of-operation guards reviewed immediately
- Never allow cleaning of debris near a punch press blade area while the machine is in an operable state without lockout confirmation
- Ensure all workers performing die changes understand they must never place any part of their body inside the danger zone unless the machine is locked out
- Keep asking: 'Before this worker reaches anywhere near this machine, is the danger zone physically guarded — or is the machine locked out?'
What Employers Must Do
- Conduct a full machine guarding audit of every punch press, press brake, and stamping machine — inventory every exposed moving part and address every unguarded point before the next shift
- Write procedures for every die change, cleaning, and adjustment task that specify the required controls before any work begins — lockout where the guard is removed, guard verification before restart
- Train all operators and maintenance workers on the specific guarding requirements for each press they use and the prohibition on reaching into unguarded danger zones under any circumstances
- Implement a guard removal permit system: guards removed for maintenance must be documented, authorized, and reinstated before the machine returns to operation
- Require supervisors to inspect all press guarding at the start of each shift before production begins
- Establish an out-of-service rule: any missing or damaged guard requires the machine to be taken out of service until the guard is reinstated — not tagged for future repair while production continues
How to Use This Case in Your Workplace
This case is a valuable safety conversation starter. Use it during toolbox talks on any floor with punch presses or stamping equipment, machine guarding audits, and training sessions for new workers on the prohibition against reaching near operating press equipment. Walk your team through the floor after reviewing this case. Ask: 'For every punch press on this floor, can a worker's hand reach the blade area while the machine is in an operable state?' 'What is the procedure when a worker needs to clean debris from near the press blades?' 'Is every guard on every press confirmed in place at the start of this shift?' This case reinforces a simple message: a punch press with an unguarded shearing hazard is a machine waiting to injure the next worker who gets close enough.
- Section 24, O. Reg. 851 requires that every exposed moving part capable of endangering a worker be guarded by a device that prevents access — this applies to punch presses, press brakes, and all stamping equipment during operation
- A machine guard must physically prevent worker access to the danger zone — it is not enough for the guard to exist if it can be bypassed or if it is not in place during operation
- Die changes, debris cleaning, and adjustments near press equipment must either have the guard in place or require full lockout — no task should allow worker access to an operating danger zone
- Temporary help agency workers assigned to press operations must receive the same machine-specific guarding and access training as permanent employees before operating or working near the equipment
- A guard removed for maintenance and not reinstated before restart is a violation the moment the machine is returned to service — supervisors must verify guard reinstatement before authorizing operation
Related Articles
Punch Press Injury — When the Guard Is Missing, the Injury Is Foreseeable
A worker at Larkin Storage and Retail Equipment's Alexandria facility was injured by an unguarded punch press. The company's own incident report identified the missing guard as a cause. Ontario Regulation 851 is clear on machine guarding. The court was too — $65,000 fine.
Read articleSteel Coil Falls on Worker — The Gap Between Two Machines That No Guard Covered
A Nelson Steel worker entered the hazard area between a turnstile and a down-ender table to repair a coil. A coworker at the controls inadvertently activated the turnstile pusher. The coil fell. No guard or shield protected the space between the machines. Ontario court: $125,000 fine — and a post-incident Ministry order the company then complied with, confirming the guard was always achievable.
Read articleWrong Bolts, No Bracing — A Pipe Fell and Trade-Mark Industrial Was Fined $80,000
A worker at Gerdau Ameristeel in Whitby was injured when a section of horizontal cooling pipe fell during a furnace installation project. A pipefitter had flagged the bolts as wrong. The foreman said to use them temporarily. Days later, when the crew repositioned the pipe skids, the south connection failed. Ontario court: $80,000 fine.
Read articlePut It Into Practice
Download our free templates and checklists to apply these concepts in your workplace today.